Cutting Native Hair
Another
little-known fact about how Europeans tried to suppress Native
tradition. Source: Indian Country Today
What was Commissioner of Indian
Affairs William Atkinson Jones worried about in January of 1902? Hair, long
hair on Native American men to be more precise.
On January 11, 1902, he sent a letter
to superintendents of federal reservations and agencies suggesting they force
Native men to cut their hair by withholding rations and employment.
“The wearing of long hair by
the male population of your agency is not in keeping with the advancement they
are making, or will soon be expected to make, in civilization,” Jones says in
the order. “The wearing of short hair by the males will be a great step in
advance and will certainly hasten their progress towards civilization.”
The letter talks about
eradicating traditional habits at boarding schools, and how the long hair
wasn’t helping if the men were allowed to grow it back out on the reservations.
What else was in the letter?
Jones talks about how both men and women “paint,” which he said causes
blindness.
“The use of this paint leads to
many diseases of the eyes… this custom causes the majority of blindness among
the Indians of the United States,” he says in the letter.
He also says that “Indian
costume and blanket” should be discouraged and that “Indian dances and
so-called Indian feasts should be prohibited.”
“In many cases these dances and
feasts are simply subterfuges to cover degrading acts and to disguise immoral
purposes,” Jones says in the letter.
Superintendents had until June
30, 1902 to report back on progress made regarding this order.
The letter outraged many, and
made national news. Slate.com
provided a rather racist paragraph that appeared in the February 8, 1902 edition
of Harper’s Weekly, in which the unnamed editors say:
“The red man has neither
newspapers, letters, books, nor games to break the monotony of his life. He
loves company. He gets all his news, all his pleasures, in daily contact with
his fellows. He has always lived in a village.”
Slate says Harper’s Weekly
also suggested that instead of forcing “government shears” on young Native men,
they should be “educated along the line of his natural aptitudes, teach him to
adapt to new conditions step by step.”
Between the public negativity
against the order, and bad publicity that ensued after some supervisors used
harsh methods to enforce the order, Jones backed down.
We Have a
Religion: The 1920s Pueblo Indian Dance Controversy and American Religious
Freedom by Tisa Wenger talks about Charles Burton, a BIA
superintendent for the Hopi and Navajo, who reportedly used “whips, guns, and
sheep shears to enforce Commissioner Jones’s infamous ‘haircut order.’”
Comments
Post a Comment